This assignment involves your having to do research. You cannotCase Study RubricThis assignment involves your having to do research. You cannot rely on your textbook.

This assignment involves your having to do research. You cannotCase Study RubricThis assignment involves your having to do research. You cannotrely on your textbook.
rely on your textbook. So I will notmiss any part of your answer, be sure to label each question. Remember thereare more than one person involved in the case [See question 3]. Finally you MUSTdevelop a risk management action plan. ACTIO plan means you must do something.What-how? Research [how to develop] an action plans.Remember APA format is important [See Syllabus for How-ToTips].Also if you list a reference there should be an in-text citation, and YESI do check references. Good Luck andHappy Researching!
PointsPossible
PointsEarned
Explanation
Question #1Summarizethe Case and the verdict
20
Question #2Basedon YOUR review and summation, do you agree with the courts decision? DEFENDYOUR ANSWER.
40
Question #3a. What practice related legal and/or ethical issue(s) [as theypertain to Health Care Management] were breached?b. How?c.By Whom?(Include ALLthe possible defendants)DEFENDYOUR ANSWER[NOTE HighPoint Value]
60
Question #4Identify anddocument a risk management actionplan to prevent this type of issue from reoccurring.[NOTE High Point Value] .
70
Minimum scholarly referenceswith in-textcitations
10
Following of Directions:1.APA Format2.Notincluding cover and referencepages,3.Not re-stating each question prior to answer
10
Multiple Grammatical/spelling/punctuation errorsNOTE how Points may belost for NOT FOLLOWING DIRECTIONS!
10
TOTAL Possible Points
220
CaseStudy #1:Failureto adequately assess and monitor the patient post operatively resulting in thepatients deathNOTE: There were multiple co-defendants in thisclaim who are discussed in this scenario.While there may have been errors/negligent acts on the part of otherdefendants, the case, comments, and recommendations are limited to the actionsof the defendant; the nurse.Thedecedent/plaintiff was a 67 year old male who underwent a right total kneereplacement. Following the procedure,the plaintiff was treated in the post-anesthesia care unit where an epiduralcatheter was inserted for postoperative pain management.Followingone episode of hypotension which was treated successfully with ephedrine, theplaintiff was discharged to an inpatient medical-surgical care nursing unitwith the epidural in place. Although thedefendant nurse customarily worked on the post-acute critical care unit, shehad been re-assigned to the medical-surgical nursing care unit. The defendant nurse stated that sheunderstood her assignment at the time of the plaintiffs admission to this unitwas to provide oversight of the patient care on the entire floor for thatshift.Thedefendant nurse assessed the plaintiff upon his admission to the unit and foundhim to be stable. The defendant nurseunderstood that the direct care of the plaintiff was assigned to a c-defendantlicensed practical nurse (LPN).Approximately three hours after arriving on the unit, the plaintiff wasunable to tolerate ordered respiratory therapy due to nausea and vomitedshortly thereafter. According to thedefendant nurse, approximately ten minutes after the episode of vomiting, theLPN found the plaintiff cyanotic and unresponsive and immediately called acode.Thedefendant nurse responded, as did the code team, and the plaintiff wasintubated and transferred to ICU. Thisaccount of events was disputed by the LPN and two other staff on the unit whounderstood that the defendant nurse was responsible for the direct care of theplaintiff.TheLPN stated that it was the defendant nurse who found the plaintiff to beunresponsive at some point after the episode of vomiting and called the codeherself. The elapsed time between theepisode of vomiting and the code is also disputed. The eventual diagnosis was anoxicencephalopathy due to the time that elapsed before CPR was initiated. The prognosis was poor and life support waswithdrawn. The plaintiff breathedindependently and was transferred to hospice care where he subsequentlyexpired.Orderedvital signs and checks of the xyphoid process were not documented. The fact that the plaintiff had experiencedhypotension in the recovery room should have warranted even closerobservation. The episode of nausea andvomiting should have resulted in additional observation and notice to thephysician.ResolutionExperts determined that the defendantnurse had breached the standard of care.
Discussion1.Summarizethe case and the verdict.2.Basedon your review and summation, do you agree with the courts decision?Defend/discuss your answer.3.Whatpractice-related legal and/or ethical issues as they pertain to Health Caremanagement were breached? How? By whom? Include the nurse as well as ALLotherpossible defendants. DEFEND your answer.4.Identifyand document a risk management actionplan to prevent this type ofissue(s) from reoccurring.
Case Study RubricThis assignment involves your having to do research. You cannotrely on your textbook. So I will notmiss any part of your answer, be sure to label each question. Remember thereare more than one person involved in the case [See question 3]. Finally you MUSTdevelop a risk management action plan. ACTIO plan means you must do something.What-how? Research [how to develop] an action plans.Remember APA format is important [See Syllabus for How-ToTips].Also if you list a reference there should be an in-text citation, and YESI do check references. Good Luck andHappy Researching! PointsPossiblePointsEarnedExplanationQuestion #1Summarizethe Case and the verdict20Question #2Basedon YOUR review and summation, do you agree with the courts decision? DEFENDYOUR ANSWER.40Question #3a. What practice related legal and/or ethical issue(s) [as theypertain to Health Care Management] were breached?b. How?c.By Whom?(Include ALLthe possible defendants)DEFENDYOUR ANSWER[NOTE HighPoint Value]60Question #4Identify anddocument a risk management actionplan to prevent this type of issue from reoccurring.[NOTE High Point Value]. 70Minimum scholarly referenceswith in-textcitations10Following of Directions: 1.APA Format2.Notincluding cover and referencepages, 3.Not re-stating each question prior to answer10Multiple Grammatical/spelling/punctuation errors NOTE how Points may belost for NOT FOLLOWING DIRECTIONS!10TOTAL Possible Points220CaseStudy #1:Failureto adequately assess and monitor the patient post operatively resulting in thepatients deathNOTE: There were multiple co-defendants in thisclaim who are discussed in this scenario.While there may have been errors/negligent acts on the part of otherdefendants, the case, comments, and recommendations are limited to the actionsof the defendant; the nurse.Thedecedent/plaintiff was a 67 year old male who underwent a right total kneereplacement. Following the procedure,the plaintiff was treated in the post-anesthesia care unit where an epiduralcatheter was inserted for postoperative pain management.Followingone episode of hypotension which was treated successfully with ephedrine, theplaintiff was discharged to an inpatient medical-surgical care nursing unitwith the epidural in place. Although thedefendant nurse customarily worked on the post-acute critical care unit, shehad been re-assigned to the medical-surgical nursing care unit. The defendant nurse stated that sheunderstood her assignment at the time of the plaintiffs admission to this unitwas to provide oversight of the patient care on the entire floor for thatshift. Thedefendant nurse assessed the plaintiff upon his admission to the unit and foundhim to be stable. The defendant nurseunderstood that the direct care of the plaintiff was assigned to a c-defendantlicensed practical nurse (LPN).Approximately three hours after arriving on the unit, the plaintiff wasunable to tolerate ordered respiratory therapy due to nausea and vomitedshortly thereafter. According to thedefendant nurse, approximately ten minutes after the episode of vomiting, theLPN found the plaintiff cyanotic and unresponsive and immediately called acode.Thedefendant nurse responded, as did the code team, and the plaintiff wasintubated and transferred to ICU. Thisaccount of events was disputed by the LPN and two other staff on the unit whounderstood that the defendant nurse was responsible for the direct care of theplaintiff.TheLPN stated that it was the defendant nurse who found the plaintiff to beunresponsive at some point after the episode of vomiting and called the codeherself. The elapsed time between theepisode of vomiting and the code is also disputed. The eventual diagnosis was anoxicencephalopathy due to the time that elapsed before CPR was initiated. The prognosis was poor and life support waswithdrawn. The plaintiff breathedindependently and was transferred to hospice care where he subsequentlyexpired.Orderedvital signs and checks of the xyphoid process were not documented. The fact that the plaintiff had experiencedhypotension in the recovery room should have warranted even closerobservation. The episode of nausea andvomiting should have resulted in additional observation and notice to thephysician. ResolutionExperts determined that the defendantnurse had breached the standard of care.Discussion1.Summarizethe case and the verdict.2.Basedon your review and summation, do you agree with the courts decision?Defend/discuss your answer.3.Whatpractice-related legal and/or ethical issues as they pertain to Health Caremanagement were breached? How? By whom? Include the nurse as well as ALLotherpossible defendants. DEFEND your answer.4.Identifyand document a risk management actionplan to prevent this type ofissue(s) from reoccurring.

 
. .

The post This assignment involves your having to do research. You cannotCase Study RubricThis assignment involves your having to do research. You cannot rely on your textbook. appeared first on nursingwritingtutors.com.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

"Is this qustion part of your assignmentt? We will write the assignment for you. click order now and get up to 40% Discount"